Arhitektonska potraga za stvarnim / Architectural Pursuit for the Real

Authors

  • Isra Tatlić University in Sarajevo, Faculty of Architecture / Univerzitet u Sarajevu, Arhitektonski fakultet

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46352/18403867.2023.165

Keywords:

architecture, design process, reality, context, user, every day

Abstract

The specificity of architectural activity in the process of creation lies in its abstraction of reality. Architects, who often do not know the context within which they operate, define goals, problems and tools based on professional analytical methods. The traditional educational system emphasizes the role of the expert as a “conductor” who controls the outcome with a drawing. At the same time, authorship and creativity enable the designer (company or project client) to determine how the newly built context functions, its appearance, and the way it is used by the end users. An even more common phenomenon is intuitive spatial activity, where due to the pressure of modern parameters of time and money, decisions are made based on the unconscious process of creation. The results are responses to fragments of reality or reckless actions on existing complex spatial relationships. During the entire process of creating a new reality, experts – who are members of the system and the macro-social level, act on the micro-social level and implement the values of the system. Ultra-subjective alienation from reality and the manipulative practice of narrative design solutions serve individuals instead of common interests. What are the possibilities of resisting the ideological construction of the new reality? If we want to improve the existing context with architecture, we should solve contradictions through spatial activity instead of hiding them ideologically. By including the subjective and objective realities of the context within which the architect operates, the possibility of strengthening the user and the community is realized. It is necessary to include reality in the creative process, in the way of their mutual interweaving instead of differentiating. It should not be the final stage of the process, but a parallel part of its initiation, development and completion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

27.12.2023

How to Cite

Tatlić, I. (2023). Arhitektonska potraga za stvarnim / Architectural Pursuit for the Real. SOPHOS: A Young Researchers’ Journal, (16), 165–192. https://doi.org/10.46352/18403867.2023.165